Peer Review Process
Turath Journal uses double-blind review, which means that author identities are concealed from the reviewers and vice versa throughout the review process.
Turath Journal utilises the ASJP (Algerian Scientific Journal Platform) as its review and editorial accreditation system.
Link: Turath Journal on ASJP
The ASJP is an electronic publishing platform for Algerian scientific journals, developed and managed by CERIST—a public scientific and technological institution under the authority of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Algeria.
-
Submission by Author
-
Authors submit their manuscript via the ASJP Platform.
-
-
Initial Check by Editorial Office
-
Scope Check: Ensures the article fits within the journal's scope.
-
Similarity Check: Screens for plagiarism or overlap with existing literature.
-
Decision:
-
Reject: If it doesn't meet scope or similarity standards.
-
Accept for Evaluation: Proceeds to the next stage.
-
-
-
Assignment to Reviewers
-
Options:
-
Sent to 2 reviewers.
-
In some cases, sent to 3 reviewers for further scrutiny.
-
-
Alternative Path: An associate editor may handle the assignment process.
-
-
Review Process
-
Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations:
-
Reject: If the article is not suitable for publication.
-
Revise: Suggest corrections or improvements.
-
Accept: If the article is of high quality and ready for publication.
-
-
-
Revision by Author
-
Authors address reviewer comments and resubmit the revised manuscript.
-
-
Final Decision by Editorial Office
-
Based on reviewer feedback and revisions:
-
Reject: If the revisions do not meet standards.
-
Accept: If the article is satisfactory.
-
-
-
Editing and Proofreading
-
The accepted article undergoes formatting and proofreading to meet publication standards.
-
-
Publication
-
The final article is published.
-