Peer Review Process
Turath uses double-blind review, which means that author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.
Review & Editorial Accreditation System : [ ASJP Platform ]
ASJP (Algerian Scientific Journal Platform) is an electronic publishing platform for Algerian scientific journals developed and managed by CERIST (CERIST is a scientific and technological public institution placed under the aegis of the Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Algeria)
Link: https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/PresentationRevue/920
-
Submission by Author
- Authors submit their manuscript via the ASJP Platform.
-
Initial Check by Editorial Office
- Scope Check: Ensures the article fits within the journal's scope.
- Similarity Check: Screens for plagiarism or overlap with existing literature.
- Decision:
- Reject: If it doesn't meet scope or similarity standards.
- Accept for Evaluation: Proceeds to the next stage.
-
Assignment to Reviewers
- Options:
- Sent to 2 reviewers.
- In some cases, sent to 3 reviewers for further scrutiny.
- Alternative Path: An associate editor may handle the assignment process.
- Options:
-
Review Process
- Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations:
- Reject: If the article is not suitable for publication.
- Revise: Suggest corrections or improvements.
- Accept: If the article is of high quality and ready for publication.
- Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations:
-
Revision by Author
- Authors address reviewer comments and resubmit the revised manuscript.
-
Final Decision by Editorial Office
- Based on reviewer feedback and revisions:
- Reject: If the revisions do not meet standards.
- Accept: If the article is satisfactory.
- Based on reviewer feedback and revisions:
-
Editing and Proofreading
- The accepted article undergoes formatting and proofreading to meet publication standards.
-
Publication
- The final article is published.